To Download PDF
Please verify your Whatsapp number first,
so you can download this pdf immediately
(a) Which points, other than the ones mentioned above, do you recall about these institutions from the previous class? Discuss in class.
(b) Can you think of a major decision made by your state government? How were the Governor, the Council of Ministers, the state assembly and the courts involved in that decision?
(a) The Prime Minister of India, the President of India, and the Parliament are the organisations mentioned. They serve numerous other purposes in addition to the aforementioned ones. In accordance with Article 60, the president's main responsibility is to uphold, defend, and conserve the Indian constitution and legal system. On the chief justice's recommendation, the president appoints the Chief Justice of India as well as other justices. The Prime Minister presides over Cabinet meetings. He oversees the operations of several divisions. If there is a dispute between two or more departments, the prime minister's decision is definitive. The Prime Minister is in charge of the several ministries' operations.
The four primary roles of parliament are scrutiny (evaluating the government), representation (acting on behalf of voters and citizens), and formulation of government.
i) The President, Vice President, and judges of the Supreme Court and High Court may all be impeached by it.
(ii) It may also retaliate against individuals who violate its privileges or show disdain for them.
(iii) Every member of parliament takes part in the vice president election.
(b) Here is an example of a significant decision. Numerous others have also occurred. The Uttar Pradesh State Government made a significant decision in 2008 to forbid the Reliance Group from opening retail stores in the state that would have sold fruits and vegetables since doing so would have harmed the interests of the small vendors of these goods. The Council of Ministers gave their approval to this decree, which the Governor then issued. It was not brought up in the State Assembly because it had nothing to do with money. There was no constitutional implication, thus the courts had no say in the matter.