To Download PDF
Please verify your Whatsapp number first,
so you can download this pdf immediately
Here are some reports of electoral malpractices from different parts of the world. Is there anything that these countries can learn from India to improve their elections? What would you suggest in each case?
(i) During an election in Nigeria, the officer in charge of counting votes deliberately increased the votes of one candidate and declared him elected. The court later found out that more than five lakh votes cast for one candidate were counted in favour of another.
(ii) Just before elections in Fiji, a pamphlet was distributed warning voters that a vote for former Prime Minister, Mahendra Chaudhry will lead to bloodshed. This was a threat to voters of Indian origin.
(iii) In the US, each state has its method of voting, its procedure of counting and its authority for conducting elections. Authorities in the state of Florida took many controversial decisions that favoured Mr. Bush in the presidential elections in 2000. But no one could change those decisions.
(i) The installation of tamper-proof electronic voting machines (EVMs) may have stopped vote tampering in Nigeria. Voter transparency can be ensured by having numerous people present when counting the ballots.
(ii) Voters of Indian descent may have been guaranteed security throughout the election process by the body that oversees elections in Fiji. Investigations into the authors of these pamphlets and harsh measures against them ought to have been implemented.
(iii) In order to ensure transparency and prevent fraud, certain election procedures must be uniform. India's Election Commission is independent, and the government is not allowed to meddle. It is not possible to guarantee that the ruling party won't manipulate elections with the help of state apparatus by using the same procedure. There ought to be a single Election Commission with the authority to create uniform election laws for every state in the union.